Trial by Patience
September 12th, 2008
Last night was one of those nights - yeah, the one of those difficult ones that leaves me wondering how differently I should have handled things…
It’s hard to say when exactly things started to fall apart so I’ll start as early as lunch. I took Gavin for lunch with a friend of mine and her daugther. Gavin didn’t really seem keen to eat lunch. He ate a couple of mouthfuls of rice and drank two thirds of his Milo. Since he’s been rubbing his gums and pointing to them saying “bite” (read: pain), I guess he’s teething again and it has put him off his food (we’re waiting for his molars to break through).
Right after we left the restaurant, Gavin started saying “ice cream”. Looking around, I didn’t see any ice cream parlours in sight so I wondered if he had gotten to the point where he expected to be fed ice cream and was refusing to eat lunch to save his tummy for dessert. Not wanting to encourage such behaviour, I told him, “No. You didn’t eat your lunch.” He didn’t make a fuss after that and we even walked past New Zealand Ice Creamery without issue.
When he got back into the car, he fell asleep on the way home. I brought him up to the room and then went back downstairs to do a couple of things. Ordinarily, I try to stay close so that I can help him settle back to sleep if he stirs. Yesterday, I was still downstairs when my SIL2 heard Gavin cry. By the time I got back upstairs, he was too wide awake to be settled back to sleep. I tried to rock and nurse him back to sleep for the next 45 minutes without success before I gave up.
We went downstairs to play with the Thomas and Friends train set that my FIL bought him a few days ago and which Gavin was absolutely nuts about. My FIL and Gavin were playing with the train set when Gavin started trying to climb the table because he couldn’t reach the train from one side of the table. Naturally, my FIL told him off and to reinforce the message, he stopped the train and bus and told Gavin, “No more.”
Gavin got upset and clearly held a grudge against his Ah Kong for telling him off. He came to the kitchen looking for an ally to turn the train and bus back on for him - at least, I think that was what he was up to. So I took him back to the train set and firmly explained to him that if he climbed on the table, he would not be allowed to play with the train set. If he wanted to play with the train set, he had to agree not to climb the table. Gavin agreed. Then I told him he had to apologise to Ah Kong, which took a bit of time because he wasn’t keen to say “sorry”. Ironically, he didn’t seem to mind apologising to me because he kept signing “sorry” to me. But since the offence was committed against Ah Kong, I insisted that he apologise to Ah Kong or there would be no more playing with the train set. Finally, he apologised and hugged Ah Kong.
Personally, I thought that whole issue was resolved pretty well.
Somewhere in the middle of all this, Ah Kong had fed Gavin some Kit Kat - which I knew was probably a mistake for Gavin to be having so close to dinner time, but since he was bonding so well with Ah Kong lately (something that hasn’t really been happening too well in the past), I didn’t have the heart to ruin the bonding session.
When dinner time rolled around, Gavin didn’t want to sit in his high chair. For the past two nights in a row, he hadn’t wanted to sit in his high chair so we allowed him to sit on a normal chair stacked with cushions. Unfortunately, Gavin is a rather messy eater and insists on feeding himself, so my SIL2 made some changes to his high chair hoping he would sit in it. Gavin balked at the high chair and flat out refused to sit despite all our efforts to bribe him, give him two options (sit in the high chair or the bumbo chair on a normal chair), talk about Higgly Town Heroes and trains, and cajole.
Gavin also refused to eat dinner and wanted more Milo from the fridge. When he couldn’t have the Milo, he started howling in frustration and hubby said to ignore him while we all continued to eat dinner.
Quite frankly, although I knew Gavin’s behaviour wasn’t acceptable, I felt we had set him up for a fall - for which I felt bad. Part of good parenting is about knowing how to handle your child to help him behave appropriately. For instance, if you want him to eat dinner, don’t feed him snacks too close to dinner time and expect him to eat dinner as well. We all know that Gavin is not a child that is crazy about eating so feeding him just before dinner will ruin his appetite.
Secondly, if he refuses to sit in the high chair, we need to decide on two things:
1. How important is it that he sits in the high chair - if we want to insist on it, we should never have started the routine of sitting on cushions because it confuses him as to why he could sit on cushions the previous two nights and suddenly he can’t sit on them last night. To make it worse, when we’re eating out, we allow him to sit on stacked chairs instead of making him sit in a high chair. No wonder he can’t understand why we’re suddenly insisting that he’s got to sit in the high chair now.
2. Is it more important that he sit in his high chair or that he eats dinner? It is unfortunate, but with a headstrong child like Gavin, you only get to choose one. Sure, you can argue that he hardly eats much during dinner any way, but do you really want to traumatise him every time dinner comes around and expect him to still have a nice impression about meal times, sitting with the family, and eating?
As an infant, Gavin likes to emulate us. We drink from a glass, he wants to drink from a glass, too. I floss my teeth, he wants to floss his teeth, too. We sit in our “adult” chairs, he wants to sit in the “adult” chair, too. It’s a normal desire.

The solution to the high chair is a simple one - create a booster that we can attach to a normal chair so he can sit in a regular chair just like everyone else.
As for not eating dinner - I’m pretty sure it was a combination of the Kit Kat and the fact that he was mad at us for forcing him to sit in the high chair. Had we eliminated those two issues, the non-eating would never have been a problem.
Where, then, is the bad behaviour?
Now this is the part where I rant. I was criticised for being too easy on Gavin - always giving in to him and letting him have whatever he wants. In other words, I’m spoiling him.
Firstly, let’s get this straight - I don’t let him have whatever he wants. I assess the situation and decide how important I think it is, whether there is a need to correct a behaviour, etc. Since I am the one who spends the most time with Gavin and nobody observes us together 24/7, no one has the right to say I give in to him every time because they are not around to observe my every action with Gavin.
Secondly, what the heck is all this “giving in” and who’s “winning” rubbish? I’m developing a relationship with my son. I try to look for “win-win” scenarios whenever possible because a happy toddler means everyone is also happy. I don’t want to be battling my toddler every step of the way just because I’m the parent and whatever I say goes, like it or not. Life isn’t like that. Relationships are not like that. Relationships are about compromises and learning to live together. A relationship with a child is no different. That doesn’t mean I’m giving him a free reign either.
It was also said that I am not disciplining him appropriately because of his violent reactions when we say “no”. This is believed to be the result of me “giving in” to him all the time.
Firstly, he’s a toddler - he’s a slave to his passions. He cannot control his emotions and disappointments the way an adult can. He simply hasn’t learned how. In time, he will - but we have to be more patient.
Secondly, how often we have to say “no” is not the issue in question. I know plenty of instances of kids who are often told “no” but that certainly doesn’t ease the pain of having to hear “no” or stop them from reacting badly.
Thirdly, it was the end of the day when all toddlers are getting tired and notoriously at their worst. Not only that, but Gavin had had a rather short afternoon nap for two days running, meaning he hasn’t been sleeping an adequate number of hours required by a toddler his age. When we’re tired, we’re also more grumpy and bad-tempered. We’re also more prone to “losing it” over small things. So why should we expect a toddler who has even less control over his emotions to behave any better?
Fourthly, I have said “no” to him plenty of times and he has taken it like a true champ without fuss. Obviously, no one remembers those incidences because we seemed wired to remember only the bad ones.
As for discipline, if my son does wrong, I tell him why it’s wrong, why I’m upset and I show him that there are consequences to his actions (e.g. no more playing with his trains). But isn’t it wrong for me to get angry at him for not wanting to eat because he’s full? Isn’t it wrong for me to get mad at him because he wants to be like everyone else and sit on a proper dining chair? Sure it’s not so convenient for me if he chooses to sit on a dining chair versus his high chair, but it isn’t a bad thing.
Yes, I agree that some of his actions are not so desirable - for instance when he gets so absorbed in watching the TV that he totally ignores whoever is talking to him. He’s a toddler, so we need to make some allowances and cut him some slack. We can’t lay down the law and expect him to behave like he’s five years old - he isn’t developmentally ready for that. What we need to do is decide what is most important to us first and foremost and correct those behaviours first (like throwing his toys and hitting people). Once those behaviours become routine, we can tackle the not so important ones (like eating with his hands instead of the spoon - my nephew, C, loves to eat and that’s because his parents don’t mind him making a mess at the dinner table and eating with his hands). This is exactly like handling tasks at work - label behaviours as high priority, medium priority and low priority and tackle them one at a time. If you try to correct everything all at once, you’ll achieve nothing and everyone will be frustrated.
Again and again, I get criticised for following the textbooks too much and trying to find the gentle way of handling things when the situation should be a simple “I’m right, you’re wrong, so do as I say!” Let me tell you why I keep looking for a better way to handle things rather than turning everything into a battle of wills…
Let’s take last night as an example. After the incident at dinner, there was a lot of upset people. Quite frankly, hubby and I argued about how things should have been handled and about Gavin “behaving badly”. We argued in front of Gavin - which did not help matters (because parents arguing in front of young children creates fear in the child because if something happens between their parents, it threatens their emotional security).
As a result of the events at dinner, I had a lot of trouble getting Gavin into the bath, I had a lot of trouble changing his diaper, and I had a lot of trouble understanding why he was suddenly extremely fussy about everything and nothing. He was teary and upset for reasons known and unknown, and he reacted poorly to everything. He went to sleep upset which has been causing his nightmares and crying in his sleep leading to him stirring far too frequently - which has made it take twice as long for me to complete this blog post. I am angry and upset at being attacked for my choices in parenting methodologies and for being accused of being a lax parent, and to top it off, I have to deal with an extra fussy toddler who would not have been so fussy if I had handled things my way. When I am upset, I’m also not able to handle my child - my patience is spread extremely thin and I’m just inches away from a meltdown myself.
So being the person who is left to deal with Gavin for the largest part of the day, please let me handle him my way.
Popularity: 9% [?]
Sphere: Related Content















About

